Logo

5C Record Merge Open House - Shared screen with speaker view
Isabel Espinal
10:34
might not put my camera on cause hard to bet a good angle where I’m sitting
Michelle Paquette (she/her)
12:12
yes
Jason Fuller
18:10
Hi All,
Ann Kardos
18:30
You know, why not join us Isabel :)
Jason Fuller
18:35
sorry I just spilled a cup of water all over in front of my computer
Rebecca Henning
20:10
no problem Jason :-)
Abigail Connick
20:21
Hi everyone, no mic today, so I'll introduce myself in chat. I'm Abigail Connick and I am the Rare Books Technical Services Project Librarian at Smith.
Sharon Domier
21:08
I’m here too but having issues with sound today.
Abigail Connick
22:18
Thanks, Rebecca!
Jack Mulvaney
38:14
I would also say yes
Susan Kimball
39:44
Very good point, Sharon
Ann Kardos
41:08
Yes, it doesn’t currently work with number only
Ann Kardos
41:49
not with either keyword or identifier search
Ann Kardos
42:00
You must include prefix plus number
Ann Kardos
42:06
in order to pull the result
Rebecca Henning
43:14
Thanks Ann
Ann Kardos
43:28
Thanks Rebecca—just want to make sure it gets in your notes for now
Ann Kardos
43:39
and that we have it as a use case to ask for this to change or so we can customize
Rebecca Henning
44:10
Ann, absolutely
Sharon Domier
49:40
Just a warning - Backstage already changed the records when they RDAd them, and this had a weird effect with foreign language materials.
Sharon Domier
50:14
We can’t batch process this stuff though.
Rebecca Henning
51:25
Sharon - clarification? which stuff?
Mary Lou Bouley
54:18
I agree with Laura and Sharon.
Mary Lou Bouley
57:45
I can try to do that with Italian and French.
Sharon Domier
58:14
Thanks Lou!
Sharon Domier
01:05:02
I will say I don’t know enough about it to comment.
Stephen Robinson
01:06:29
Seconding Sharon's comment. Don't know enough.
susanpease
01:06:50
Would the 930 and other 9XX s not show up at all in records in the new system
Rebecca Henning
01:07:37
susan - that is correct, in my understanding
susanpease
01:07:41
The field with the cataloger’s initials is helpful
Sharon Domier
01:08:09
At UMass we used a 910 to keep cataloger statistics. I know some of the other 4C did in the old days, but I don’t think they do anymore.
Ann Kardos
01:08:29
And there will be some other way of identifying cataloger at some point, but I don’t remember what that is
susanpease
01:08:36
I find it helpful knowing who the cataloger was
Ann Kardos
01:08:59
and for the 5C, we’ve said that we will wait for that up to one year
Ann Kardos
01:09:02
I think
susanpease
01:09:56
What does “can wait up to one year” mean?
Lucy deGozzaldi
01:10:22
The 930 is used in a program that I run to update the equivalent OCLC numbered records in Connexion. Maybe there will be another way to do this?
Rebecca Henning
01:10:26
It means we have said we are willing to go live in FOLIO without a feature
susanpease
01:10:40
It’s very helpful if you need to know why something that looks odd is that way
susanpease
01:12:05
If you have to go through a long process to find who the cataloger is, it wouldn’t be use the time. The advantage is that you can quickly get info from someone, by asking them.
susanpease
01:12:38
*use the time= worth the time
Michelle Paquette (she/her)
01:13:09
I don’t know enough about our 9XXs to say with confidence what is and isn’t important. Would need to do a deep dive
Michelle Paquette (she/her)
01:14:32
We do use 949 to record accession numbers on rare books
Abigail Connick
01:15:24
We don't care if that 949 field is visible, we just want the data for the catalogers. :)
Sharon Domier
01:15:56
Michelle - you might need to look at adding it to the source of acquisition field 54*
Rebecca Henning
01:15:56
Michelle and Abigail, understood!
Michelle Paquette (she/her)
01:16:42
Understood, Ann. Thanks! Abigail and I will think through it
Abigail Connick
01:16:48
Hmm. That could possibly work. Thanks, all.
Ann Kardos
01:16:50
thanks michelle!!!
Colin Van Alstine
01:17:45
(almost like I knew that was the next slide!)
Sharon Domier
01:18:46
good job Colin
Sharon Domier
01:19:44
I was busy:)
Michelle Paquette (she/her)
01:20:52
Nope, this makes sense thanks Jennifer
Michelle Paquette (she/her)
01:25:39
Colin I actually just started work on this today
Michelle Paquette (she/her)
01:26:13
(Hence my MarcEdit questions for you earlier today). But yes thanks for the reminder that this impacts ALL records not just merging records
Colin Van Alstine
01:26:18
Is this why you were asking about "adding a subfield when there is another field present?" :)
Sharon Domier
01:26:26
But we aren’t saying that ALL 5XX fields need a $5, just the ones that are institution specific.
Michelle Paquette (she/her)
01:26:26
haha
Rebecca Henning
01:26:27
Michelle - I might reach out to you cause I'm working on this too
Michelle Paquette (she/her)
01:26:39
Sounds great Rebecca.
Michelle Paquette (she/her)
01:26:49
Two heads are better than 1
Ann Kardos
01:27:01
Potpourri!!!
Lucy deGozzaldi
01:27:05
I have a question RE the 069 field?
Sharon Domier
01:27:23
Lucy I think we can save it for later.
Rebecca Henning
01:27:40
Lucy, just jump in, unless your mic isn't working?
Ann Kardos
01:27:50
jump in!!!
Lucy deGozzaldi
01:31:53
Thank you Jennifer, this is useful information.
Sharon Domier
01:32:43
I need to duck out.
Ann Kardos
01:32:55
Bye sharon!
Rebecca Henning
01:32:55
thanks Sharon!
Steven Bischof
01:37:12
Need to go to another meeting. Thanks all for coming
Ann Kardos
01:39:09
this was great—thank RMWG
Heather Deirdre
01:39:15
Thank you!
Marilyn Billings
01:39:17
Thanks so much for this detailed update Jennifer and team.
Mary Lou Bouley
01:39:24
Thanks!
Michelle Paquette (she/her)
01:39:33
Thank you for the update
Rachel Beckwith
01:39:40
Thank you!
Abigail Connick
01:39:40
Agreed. Thank you, everyone, for your work on this!
Susan Kimball
01:40:24
Thanks all!
susanpease
01:41:06
Thanks, everyone!